Endovascular thrombectomy and medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in acute stroke: a randomized care trial”

dc.contributor.authorKhoury, Naim N.
dc.contributor.authorDarsaut, Tim E.
dc.contributor.authorGhostine, Jimmy
dc.contributor.authorDeschaintre, Yan
dc.contributor.authorDaneault, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorDurocher, André
dc.contributor.authorLanthier, Sylvain
dc.contributor.authorPoppe, Alexandre Y.
dc.contributor.authorOdier, Céline
dc.contributor.authorLebrun, Louise-Hélène
dc.contributor.authorGuilbert, François
dc.contributor.authorGentric, Jean-Christophe
dc.contributor.authorBatista, André Lima
dc.contributor.authorWeill, Alain
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorBracard, Serge
dc.contributor.authorRaymond, Jean
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-17T16:18:24Z
dc.date.available2023-05-17T16:18:24Z
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.description.resumoBackground. – Until recently, the benefits of endovascular treatment in stroke were not proven. Care trials have been designed to simultaneously offer yet-to-be validated interventions and verify treatment outcomes. Our aim was to implement a care trial for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods. – The study was offered to all patients considered for endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke in one Canadian hospital. Inclusion criteria were broad: onset of symptoms ≤ 5 h or at any time in the presence of clinical-imaging mismatch and suspected or demonstrated proximal large vessel occlusion. Exclusion criteria were few: established infarction or hemorrhagic transforma tion of the target symptomatic territory and poor 3-month prognosis. The primary outcome was mRS ≤ 2 at 3 months. Patients were randomly allocated to standard care or standard care plus endovascular treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier NCT02157532. Results. – Seventy-seven patients were recruited in 19 months (March 2013–October 2014) at a single center. Randomized allocation was interrupted when other trials showed the benefits of endovascular therapy. At 3 months, 20 of 40 patients (50.0%; 95% CI: 35%–65%) in the intervention group had reached the primary outcome, compared to 14 of 37 patients (37.8%; 95% CI: 24%–54%) in the control group (P = 0.36). Eleven patients in the intervention group died within 3 months compared to 9 patients in the standard care group. Conclusion. – A care trial was implemented to offer verifiable care to acute stroke patients. This approach offers a promising means to manage clinical dilemmas and guide uncertain practices.pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationKHOURY, Naim N.; DARSAUT, Tim E.; GHOSTINE, Jimmy; DESCHAINTRE, Yan; DANEAULT, Nicole; DUROCHER, André; LANTHIER, Sylvain; POPPE, Alexandre Y.; ODIER, Céline; LEBRUN, Louise-Hélène. Erratum to “Endovascular thrombectomy and medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in acute stroke: a randomized care trial⠽ Journal of Neuroradiol. 44 (2017) 198⠳202. Journal Of Neuroradiology, [S.L.], v. 44, n. 5, p. 351, set. 2017. Elsevier BV. DOI; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2017.05.005pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neurad.2017.01.126
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/52461
dc.languagept_BRpt_BR
dc.subjectacute strokept_BR
dc.subjectendovascular treatmentpt_BR
dc.subjectthrombectomypt_BR
dc.subjectrandomized clinical trialpt_BR
dc.titleEndovascular thrombectomy and medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in acute stroke: a randomized care trial”pt_BR
dc.typearticlept_BR

Arquivos

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.45 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Baixar