Logo do repositório
  • Página Inicial(current)
  • Buscar
    Por Data de PublicaçãoPor AutorPor TítuloPor Assunto
  • Tutoriais
  • Documentos
  • Sobre o RI
  • Eventos
    Repositório Institucional da UFRN: 15 anos de conexão com o conhecimento
  • Padrão
  • Amarelo
  • Azul
  • Verde
  • English
  • Português do Brasil
Entrar

SIGAA

  1. Início
  2. Pesquisar por Autor

Navegando por Autor "Pontual, Maria Luíza dos Anjos"

Filtrar resultados informando as primeiras letras
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Resultados por página
  • Opções de Ordenação
  • Carregando...
    Imagem de Miniatura
    Artigo
    30-Month randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite
    (2011) Andrade, Ana Karina Maciel de; Duarte, Rosângela Marques; Silva, Fábia Danielle Sales Cunha Medeiros e; Batista, André Ulisses Dantas; Lima, Kenio Costa de; Pontual, Maria Luíza dos Anjos; Montes, Marcos Antonio Japiassú Resende
    Objective To evaluate the clinical performance of a nanofill and a nanohybrid composite in restorations in occlusal cavities of posterior teeth in a randomised trial over 30 months. Methods Forty-one adolescents participated in the study. The teeth were restored with a nanofill (Filtek Z350, 3M ESPE), a nanohybrid (Esthet-X, Dentsply); Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE) was used as a control. After 30 months, the restorations were evaluated in accordance with the US Public Health Service (USPHS) modified criteria. The McNemar and Friedman tests were used for statistical analysis, at a level of significance of 5%. Results There were significant differences in the roughness of Filtek Z250 (p = 0.008) and Filtek Z350 (p < 0.001) when the four time periods (baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 30 months) were compared. There were significant differences in the marginal adaptation of Filtek Z250 (p = 0.001), Filtek Z350 (p < 0.001) and Esthet-X (p = 0.011). Except for one of each composite restoration, all the modifications ranged from Alpha to Bravo. There were significant differences in the surface roughness (p = 0.005) when the three composites were compared after 30 months. Conclusions The materials investigated showed acceptable clinical performance after 30 months. Long-term re-evaluations are necessary for a more detailed analysis of these composites (CEP: #1252).
Repositório Institucional - UFRN Campus Universitário Lagoa NovaCEP 59078-970 Caixa postal 1524 Natal/RN - BrasilUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte© Copyright 2025. Todos os direitos reservados.
Contato+55 (84) 3342-2260 - R232Setor de Repositórios Digitaisrepositorio@bczm.ufrn.br
DSpaceIBICT
OasisBR
LAReferencia
Customizado pela CAT - BCZM